 |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G76 3EEMC4 or Apple A12 Bionic.
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 293982 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6841 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 459 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.84 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
