 |
Mali-G57 MP4 at 600 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MP4 or Apple A12 Bionic.
Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 346612 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 8203 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 498 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 386 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.4 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
