 |
Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-08-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MC4 or Apple A12 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 128 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 509737 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 12756 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 320 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
