 |
Adreno 642L at 550 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 22-08-2021
Detailed comparison data of Adreno 642L @ 550MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Adreno 642L or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Adreno 642L @ 550MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 642L @ 550MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 550 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 512 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 507648 | 293982 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 16978 | 6841 | | | | | GFloPS | 906.58 GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 391 MT/s | 459 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.63 GP/s | 4.84 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 642L @ 550MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
