 |
Mali-G615 MC2 at 1100 MHz vs Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2024
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz vs Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Antutu v10, 9, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, Geekbench 6, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 MC2 or Apple A17 Bionic.
Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz vs Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz |
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
| Frequency | 1100 MHz | 3640 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm | | Antutu v10 | 709246 | 1314628 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 256540 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1856 GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3956 MT/s | 1420 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 165 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
