 |
Mali-G610 MC4 at 700 MHz vs Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 18-03-2023
Ultimate benchmark examination data of Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz vs Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G610 MC4 or Apple A17 Bionic.
Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz vs Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz |
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 3640 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 3 nm | | Antutu v10 | 671986 | 1314628 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19875 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1176 GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2576 MT/s | 1420 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 98 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
