 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G610 MP6 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Comprehensive compare data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G610 MP6 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G610 MP6.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G610 MP6 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G610 MP6 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 568246 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 18436 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 912 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 2064 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 72 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MP6 @ 600MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
