 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G78 MP10 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Detailed compare data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G78 MP10 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G78 MP10.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G78 MP10 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G78 MP10 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 640085 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 854 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 1896 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 68 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78 MP10 @ 700MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
