 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023 Full compare data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, GFXBench, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Neocore, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G610 MC3.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz |
Frequency | 3640 MHz | 600 MHz | Cores | 6 | 3 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 3 nm | 6 nm | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 586434 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19875 | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 1008 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 2208 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 84 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 12 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|