 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Detailed compare data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G710 MP16.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 738743 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 20145 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 1174 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 2648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 92 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
