 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G78 MP22 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023 Detailed comparison data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G78 MP22 @ 650MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G78 MP22.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G78 MP22 @ 650MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G78 MP22 @ 650MHz |
Frequency | 3640 MHz | 650 MHz | Cores | 6 | 22 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 685362 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19078 | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 986 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 2245 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 79 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78 MP22 @ 650MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|