 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G78 MP24 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G78 MP24 @ 650MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G78 MP24.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G78 MP24 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G78 MP24 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 726680 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19040 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 1076 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 2463 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 86 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78 MP24 @ 650MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
