 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Detailed compare data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as PassMark, PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Immortalis-G715 MC16.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 750 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 1268278 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 33860 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 2600 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 124 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
