 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G710 MP07 at 850 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Full comparison data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G710 MP07 @ 850MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G710 MP07.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G710 MP07 @ 850MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G710 MP07 @ 850MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 850 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 796874 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 20145 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 1535.23 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 3463 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 120.31 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP07 @ 850MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
