|
Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022 Full comparison data of Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A15 Bionic GPU or Mali-G610 MC3.
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz |
Frequency | 3232 MHz | 600 MHz | Cores | 5 | 3 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | Antutu v10 | 841256 | 586434 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19875 | | | | GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | 1008 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 1233 MT/s | 2208 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.23 GP/s | 84 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 12 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|