 |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 204591 | 293982 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 7059 | 6841 | | | | | GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 751 MT/s | 459 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 7.65 GP/s | 4.84 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
