|
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021 Comprehensive compare data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
Frequency | 820 MHz | 800 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | Antutu v10 | 195461 | 293982 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6674 | 6841 | | | | GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 459 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.6 GP/s | 4.84 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|