 |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2022
Extreme benchmark examination data of Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Immortalis-G715 MC16 or Mali-G68 MC4.
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 128 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1268278 | 509737 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 33860 | 12756 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2600 MT/s | 320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 124 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
