 |
Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Extreme benchmark examination data of Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as 3DMark, GFXBench, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Apple A15 Bionic GPU or Mali-G68 MC4.
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3232 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 128 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 841256 | 509737 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 12756 | | | | | GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1233 MT/s | 320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 39.23 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
