 |
Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Ultimate benchmark examination data of Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A15 Bionic GPU or Mali-G710 MP16.
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 3232 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 841256 | 738743 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 20145 | | | | | GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | 1174 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1233 MT/s | 2648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 39.23 GP/s | 92 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
