 |
Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Detailed comparison data of Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A15 Bionic GPU or Mali-G68 MP6.
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 3232 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 841256 | 589642 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | 684 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1233 MT/s | 2120 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 39.23 GP/s | 96 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
