 |
PowerVR GT7400 Plus at 800 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Full comparison data of PowerVR GT7400 Plus @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR GT7400 Plus or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
PowerVR GT7400 Plus @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR GT7400 Plus @ 800MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 820 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 142368 | 195461 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 6674 | | | | | GFloPS | 204 GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 416 MT/s | 648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.6 GP/s | 6.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR GT7400 Plus @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
