|
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021 Hardcore benchmark examination data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G57 MP4.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz |
Frequency | 820 MHz | 600 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 16 nm | 16 nm | Antutu v10 | 195461 | 346612 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6674 | 8203 | | | | GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | 498 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 386 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.6 GP/s | 6.4 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|