|
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021 Detailed comparison data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Vellamo, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G72 MP3.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz |
Frequency | 820 MHz | 800 MHz | Cores | 2 | 3 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm | Antutu v10 | 195461 | 158380 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6674 | 5731 | | | | GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | 184 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 117 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.6 GP/s | 3.6 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|