 |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz vs Adreno 616 at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Maximum benchmark examination data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Adreno 616 @ 500MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Adreno 616.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Adreno 616 @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
Adreno 616 @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 820 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 256 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 195461 | 190434 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6674 | 6320 | | | | | GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | 459.38 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 258 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.6 GP/s | 6.57 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Adreno 616 @ 500MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
