 |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, 3DMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 820 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 195461 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6674 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.6 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
