 |
Adreno 675 at 600 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 01-08-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Adreno 675 @ 600MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PassMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Adreno 675 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Adreno 675 @ 600MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 675 @ 600MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 820 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 2 | | Shaders | 512 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 309457 | 195461 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 107423 | 6674 | | | | | GFloPS | 657.23 GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 309 MT/s | 648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 7.88 GP/s | 6.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 675 @ 600MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
