 |
Mali-G72 MP4 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G72 MP4 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 820 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 198765 | 195461 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 6674 | | | | | GFloPS | 184 GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 117 MT/s | 648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 3.6 GP/s | 6.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
