|
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz vs Mali-G71 MP4 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021 Full comparison data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G71 MP4 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2 etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G71 MP4.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G71 MP4 @ 950MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
Mali-G71 MP4 @ 950MHz |
Frequency | 820 MHz | 950 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 16 nm | 16 nm | Antutu v10 | 195461 | 122158 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6674 | 5884 | | | | GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | 169 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 407 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.6 GP/s | 3.1 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G71 MP4 @ 950MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|