|
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021 Extreme benchmark examination data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G72 MP3.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz |
Frequency | 820 MHz | 700 MHz | Cores | 2 | 3 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm | Antutu v10 | 195461 | 122084 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6674 | 4788 | | | | GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | 161 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 648 MT/s | 102 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.6 GP/s | 3.15 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|