 |
Mali-G57 MC2 at 950 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 24-01-2021
Ultimate benchmark examination data of Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MC2 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 820 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 308465 | 195461 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 6674 | | | | | GFloPS | 486 GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 368 MT/s | 648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.1 GP/s | 6.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
