 |
Mali-400 at 400 MHz vs Mali-T820 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Mali-400 @ 400MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like 3DMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-400 or Mali-T820.
Mali-400 @ 400MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-400 @ 400MHz |
Mali-T820 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 400 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 1 | 1 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 13643 | 26122 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 613 | 871 | | | | | GFloPS | 3.6 GFloPS | 10.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 44 MT/s | 104 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 0.38 GP/s | 0.61 GP/s | | DirectX | | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-400 @ 400MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Mali-T820 @ 600MHz is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
