 |
Adreno 302 at 400 MHz vs Mali-T820 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Adreno 302 @ 400MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as GFXBench, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Adreno 302 or Mali-T820.
Adreno 302 @ 400MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 302 @ 400MHz |
Mali-T820 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 400 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 1 | | Shaders | 24 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 14506 | 26122 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 696 | 871 | | | | | GFloPS | 19.2 GFloPS | 10.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 66 MT/s | 104 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 0.8 GP/s | 0.61 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 302 @ 400MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-T820 @ 600MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
