 |
Adreno 320 at 400 MHz vs Mali-T820 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Maximum benchmark examination data of Adreno 320 @ 400MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Adreno 320 or Mali-T820.
Adreno 320 @ 400MHz vs Mali-T820 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 320 @ 400MHz |
Mali-T820 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 400 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 1 | | Shaders | 96 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 32491 | 26122 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 871 | | | | | GFloPS | 86.4 GFloPS | 10.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 225 MT/s | 104 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.4 GP/s | 0.61 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 320 @ 400MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-T820 @ 600MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
