 |
Mali-T860 MP4 at 600 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-T860 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-T860 MP4 or Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).
Mali-T860 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T860 MP4 @ 600MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | | Antutu v10 | 72864 | 60399 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 3153 | | | | | GFloPS | 81.6 GFloPS | 96 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 262 MT/s | 312 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.2 GP/s | 3.2 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T860 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
