 |
Mali-G52 MP1 at 800 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Ultimate benchmark examination data of Mali-G52 MP1 @ 800MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 MP1 or Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).
Mali-G52 MP1 @ 800MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G52 MP1 @ 800MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 1 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | | Antutu v10 | 90746 | 60399 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 32546 | 3153 | | | | | GFloPS | 386 GFloPS | 96 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 312 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 7.96 GP/s | 3.2 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 MP1 @ 800MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
