 |
Mali-T860 MP4 at 922 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-T860 MP4 @ 922MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-T860 MP4 or Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).
Mali-T860 MP4 @ 922MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T860 MP4 @ 922MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 922 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | | Antutu v10 | 84596 | 60399 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 3153 | | | | | GFloPS | 125.39 GFloPS | 96 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 403 MT/s | 312 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 3.38 GP/s | 3.2 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T860 MP4 @ 922MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
