|
Mali-T624 MP4 at 533 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 25-01-2021 Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-T624 MP4 @ 533MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Neocore, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-T624 MP4 or Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail).
Mali-T624 MP4 @ 533MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-T624 MP4 @ 533MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz |
Frequency | 533 MHz | 500 MHz | Cores | 4 | 16 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | Antutu v10 | 68743 | 60399 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 3153 | | | | GFloPS | 19.2 GFloPS | 96 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 102 MT/s | 312 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 0.7 GP/s | 3.2 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T624 MP4 @ 533MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|