 |
Mali-G710 MP16 at 650 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Extreme benchmark examination data of Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G710 MP16 or Apple A12X Bionic.
Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 650 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 7 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 738743 | 653237 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 20145 | 18183 | | | | | GFloPS | 1174 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2648 MT/s | 610 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92 GP/s | 15 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
