|
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021 Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Mali-G57 MP4.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz |
Frequency | 950 MHz | 600 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 16 nm | 16 nm | Antutu v10 | 204591 | 346612 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 7059 | 8203 | | | | GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | 498 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 751 MT/s | 386 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 7.65 GP/s | 6.4 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|