 |
PowerVR GT7400 Plus at 800 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Ultimate benchmark examination data of PowerVR GT7400 Plus @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy PowerVR GT7400 Plus or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
PowerVR GT7400 Plus @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR GT7400 Plus @ 800MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 142368 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 204 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 416 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.6 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR GT7400 Plus @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
