 |
Adreno 680 at 600 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 01-08-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of Adreno 680 @ 600MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Quadrant, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Adreno 680 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Adreno 680 @ 600MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 680 @ 600MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 2 | | Shaders | 512 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 347869 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 12539 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 712 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 320 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 8.4 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 680 @ 600MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
