 |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz vs Adreno 616 at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Full compare data of Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz vs Adreno 616 @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G52 2EEMC2 or Adreno 616.
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz vs Adreno 616 @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
Adreno 616 @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 256 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 204591 | 190434 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 7059 | 6320 | | | | | GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | 459.38 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 751 MT/s | 258 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 7.65 GP/s | 6.57 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Adreno 616 @ 500MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
