 |
Mali-G72 MP3 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Ultimate benchmark examination data of Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G72 MP3 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 158380 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 5731 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 184 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 117 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 3.6 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
