 |
Mali-G72 MP4 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Full comparison data of Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G72 MP4 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 198765 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 184 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 117 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 3.6 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
