 |
Mali-G72 MP3 at 700 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Ultimate benchmark testing data of Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G72 MP3 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 122084 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 4788 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 161 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 102 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 3.15 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP3 @ 700MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
