 |
PowerVR GT7600 at 900 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Maximum benchmark examination data of PowerVR GT7600 @ 900MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR GT7600 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
PowerVR GT7600 @ 900MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR GT7600 @ 900MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 900 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 2 | | Shaders | 196 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 255468 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 186 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 396 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 9.3 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR GT7600 @ 900MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
