 |
Mali-G68 MP6 at 700 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 26-01-2021
Full compare data of Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP6 or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 589642 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 684 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2120 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
