 |
Adreno 320 at 400 MHz vs PowerVR G6200 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Detailed comparison data of Adreno 320 @ 400MHz vs PowerVR G6200 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PCMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Adreno 320 or PowerVR G6200.
Adreno 320 @ 400MHz vs PowerVR G6200 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 320 @ 400MHz |
PowerVR G6200 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 400 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 2 | | Shaders | 96 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 32491 | 51073 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 3694 | | | | | GFloPS | 86.4 GFloPS | 76.8 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 225 MT/s | 245 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.4 GP/s | 2.4 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 10 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 320 @ 400MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which PowerVR G6200 @ 600MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
