|
Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD EPYC 75F3 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-08-2021 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD EPYC 75F3 and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, PassMark, Handbrake, 7zip, AIDA64, Furmark, SuperPi, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, RealBench, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, PCMark 10, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 75F3 or Intel Core i9-13900K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900K | 68% |
EPYC 75F3 | 70% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 75F3 is 2% better than Core i9-13900K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900K | 64% |
EPYC 75F3 | 81% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 114.3 | 143.7 | Valorant | 129.9 | 163.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.7 | 91.4 | Apex Legends | 122.1 | 153.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 97.4 | 122.5 | Overwatch | 105.2 | 132.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 89.6 | 112.7 | DOOM Eternal | 64.9 | 81.6 | Warzone | 101.3 | 127.4 | Assassin's Creed | 109.1 | 137.2 | Valheim | 107.8 | 135.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900K | 66% |
EPYC 75F3 | 17% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900K is more energy efficient than the EPYC 75F3 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 531 | 207 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5603 | 8519 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 887 | 388 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12458 | 18057 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3150 | 955 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 35852 | 46957 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Single-Core | 2879 | 2010 | Multi-Core | 61110 | 68880 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Single-Core | 2502 | 1484 | Multi-Core | 25761 | 54596 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Announcement date | December 13, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 13 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 2.95 MHz | Cores | 24 | 32 | Threads | 32 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 76000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 280 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | yes | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000313 100-100000313WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900K is 31% better than EPYC 75F3 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 75F3 has 8 more core than Core i9-13900K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900K is better: 18
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 19 Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD EPYC 75F3 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 75F3 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|